Obviously this is a limited test, but interesting and pretty fair how they treat noise and settings across different engines. Render engines are a very complex matter, there is no bad render engine, they are all masterpieces, no matter if I personally consider an specific render engine useless for my workflow or not, in general they are math masterpieces that work incredibly well, and to evaluate them it’s a complex thing, specially if you don’t master every render engine. Luckily the author of the tests is a serious person and nothing like you, he saw the feedback gave by different users and listened to it, showed true interest in improving this investigation and fixing any possible flaws that could have been detected in the process, and he is prepairing a second version, I will collaborate with him as other experts in different render engines to ensure the next study is more precise.
I want the information to be as correct as possible, I don’t care if Cycles is defined as the slowest render engine of history or if LuxCore is considered garbage, what I want is to ensure that the information is as good as possible, it’s good for the users in general, and it’s good for the engines themselves to know where they are and what to improve. You notice that Cycles-X is considered the fastest one after Vray right in the all-rounded?Īlso you noticed that Corona is way behind all the GPU render engines, including LuxCore (which is incorrectly tested here), right?
0 kommentar(er)
